29 Apr
2014
29 Apr
'14
5:49 p.m.
I mean whether this way of composition of shapes will
be also available to Mondrian.
Could be. We have to see. Mondrian is (really) good only for a restricted set of
situations.
The way I understand it so far, is that Mondrian is a
higher level library based on Roassal. It can do things that Roassal can in fewer steps
focusing on visualization of object structures. So as Roassal needs to deal with complex
shapes so does Mondrian. Am I correct ?
Yes, making Roassal things available in Mondrian is not a big deal.
Do you mean that RTMondrianViewBuilder already acts as
the compositor of complex shapes for Mondrian ? If yes that means that Mondrian will not
be affected by these improvements ?
The class RTMondrianViewBuilder is simply a builder (i.e., generate low Roassal
instruction from a specification tied to a particular model). It does not compose shapes,
but instead generates elements with shapes (as all the builder do).
Alexandre
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel(a)me.com> wrote:
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Is this going to carry to Mondrian as well ?
I do not understand this question :-)
Roassal has a Mondrian builder in it, the class RTMondrianViewBuilder…
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev