28 Jun
2007
28 Jun
'07
5:33 p.m.
Hi,
That is nice, because we ended up with a similar solution, but
instead of an integer we use a string. When the data is unknown, we
do not specify it.
Doru
On Jun 28, 2007, at 5:16 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
--
www.iam.unibe.ch/~girba
www.iam.unibe.ch/~girba/blog/
"In a world where everything is moving ever faster,
one might have better chances to win by moving slower."
There are some
differences in naming that can be easily fixed, such
as we use "parent" instead of "belongsTo". The other main difference
concerns modifiers of entities. We use an integer to represent the
scope, static, abstract, etc. modifier of classes, methods, and
attributes instead of having extra attributes.
Indeed this would be an idea. Do you have a way to say that a value
is unknown
For example I want to say that a method is a getter but I could
also want to say that it is
not known that it is a getter that is different from it is not a
getter.