1 Feb
2008
1 Feb
'08
8:10 a.m.
I = A -> B, I is the inheritance definition between A, B such that:
- I subclass = A
- I superclass = B
- A outgoingInheritance includes I,
- B incomingInheritance includes I.
I think the confusion is because we actually never used the
incomingInheritance and outgoingInheritance, because these are
derived, and before we only saved in MSE underived attributes. So,
before we only counted on the subclass and superclass definitions, and
they are the correct ones.
But in the latest version it is fixed.
Doru
On Feb 1, 2008, at 12:17 AM, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
I dont understand, is it as follows?
A superclass
B subclass
cheers,
AA
On 31 Jan 2008, at 21:20 , Tudor Girba wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"Value is always contextual."
If A -> B, it should mean that
- A has an outgoingInheritance to B, and
- B has an incomingInheritance from A.
I fixed the descriptions now.
Doru
On Jan 31, 2008, at 7:38 PM, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Which one is the superclass and which one the
subclass? The current
implementation of Moose seems to do the opposite of the Famix spec,
so which one is right? ^^
AA
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"In a world where everything is moving ever faster,
one might have better chances to win by moving slower."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev