[Moose-dev] Re: Issue 880 in moose-technology: Improving VerveineJ stub invocations/methods

Comment #1 on issue 880 by tu...(a)tudorgirba.com: Improving VerveineJ stub invocations/methods http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=880 Actually, this observation applies not just for invocations to stub methods, but for any kind of invocations. Let's take the invocation example: aMethod(a, b()), where a and b() are of types A and B, respectively Right now, even if we know the method, we get as a signature aMethod(A, B). This information is essentially not useful, because we already have the definition of the method and its parameters. So, even in this case, we would still benefit from having aMethod(a, b()) as a signature because it provides extra information.