14 Dec
2009
14 Dec
'09
4:13 p.m.
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre(a)bergel.eu>wrote;wrote:
FAMIX does not describe runtime objects. It depends
what you want to do,
but it could be interesting to have a meta-model for describing runtime
entities.
Sorry Alexandre, I don't know what FAMIX is and google didn't help me
very
much.
Orla worked on DynaMoose (
http://moose.unibe.ch/tools/dynamoose ). It
supports object flow analysis. You may find it useful.
I checked DynaMoose but I does not seem to have what I need. So, I will
explain a bit more what I am needing right now.
I am understating and hacking a bit with ImageSegment. With then, you create
a segment, and you have to create it based in a graph of objects. Actually,
in the implementation details, you have an array of the root objects. But
ImageSegments only takes the objects that are ONLY referenced inside that
array (it uses the GC techniques to achieve this task). So, what I want is
to analyze with a visualization that array of objects and see the relations
between them and, if possible to the "external world" (external to the
array).
What do you think ?
Thanks,
Mariano
Alexandre
On 14 Dec 2009, at 10:47, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
Hi folks! I have just subscribed to the mailing list.
I have a little question for you. I want to analyze and see a graphic of a
graph of objects and the references between them. Note that I want objects,
at runtime. Not static, not classes.
Is there something in Moose that I can use ?
Cheers,
Mariano
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev