24 Jul
2012
24 Jul
'12
9:38 p.m.
On Jul 24, 2012, at 9:23 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
I'm sorry but we do not want to give everything for free all the time.
:) it was just a joke.
I want to say that I am not sure the message is good: "you can use Moose, it is
open-source, but must pay for importing data".
You are right, this is a commercial message, and maybe it is a bonus for Synectique...
It is not a bonus. It is important. Our goal is to make sure that our company gets a
chance in face of the too many companies in the field.
Not from you, but we are experimenting some tools and guys do not answers about their
tools... so not possible to compare.
---
Jannik Laval
Now, I have a researcher point of view and I
think that using a tool that is open source is easier than contacting guys and maybe they
answer or not. And if not ? I will use another tool.
did you send an email and did
not get an answer? I guess not so there is no problem. I think that having a company around moose is the best
that can happen to Moose even if it can make the system more complex.
If we play smart everybody can benefit from it.
If synectique fails then it will be far easier but much sadder.
You are probably right.
And I hope the best for Synectique.
Jannik
I only give my opinion on something that does not
concern me directly.
:)
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev