[Moose-dev] Re: Class Extensions

I understand your point I fear this may be problematic. In the Pharo version of Moose (I haven't checked for VW), FAMIXClass is referenced in a number of places. For example: - FAMIXInvocation>>isAPotentialIncomingInvocationFor: contains 'invoRVar class = FAMIXClass' - FAMIXClass>>isADirectSubclassOf: contains 'aClass class = FAMIXClass' This suggest that instances of FAMIXClassExtension will probably not be have the same effect when a FAMIXClass is expected. It does not seem to be a big deal though. But why FAMIXClass>>isExtended is not enough? Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.