11 Sep
2015
11 Sep
'15
4:39 p.m.
On 9/11/15 6:52 AM, Thierry Goubier wrote:
Hi Usman,
as far as I know, I see two things:
- Metacello and Monticello have no true concept of branch names in
their code; there is code where when you decode a package version
name, you throw away some of the name to keep only the package name,
the version and the author.
I prefer to state this slightly differently:)
Monticello has no first class support of package branches. The naming
convention referred to by Thierry is only a file naming convention.
Metacello _honors_ the Monticello naming convention, by allowing you to
specify that a branch be used by allowing you to associate a filename
with a package:
spec package: 'Seaside-Core' with: [spec file: 'Seaside-Core.gemstone'
]
Dale