So, what the
definition of FAMIXFunction>>packageScope should look like?
There is no notion of packageScope for a Function, so it should return nil in this case.
I added
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
FAMIXFunction>>packageScope
"No package scope for functions"
^ nil
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
in Famix-Core-AlexandreBergel.188
This could always be adjusted in the future when one need to analyze languages that has
scoped function (e.g., Racket)
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel
http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.