7 Dec
2014
7 Dec
'14
9:21 p.m.
Ok. Let's give this a shot. So, we would need versions in all
configurations that point to the concrete number or #stable of the other
configurations.
Cheers,
Doru
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Stephan Eggermont <stephan(a)stack.nl> wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
No. We will
create a stable version of each configuration that will be
versioned based on the
numbering of each configurations.
Last time I was not so happy with the results of using numbered
configurations. The release version stopped being usable about
a week after the release date. With a symbolic name we can fix critical
bugs that stop newcomers from using Moose.
Last time we had a development version that didn't work because of
significant Pharo3 surgery and a stable version that
couldn't be build because of numbered configurations. If possible I would
like to avoid that this time.
Stephan
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev