Cool. Is there a downside of using the Optimized version as the default version?
No downside as far as I can see.
Alexandre
Cheers, Doru
On Dec 7, 2015, at 9:10 PM, Alexandre Bergel alexandre.bergel@me.com wrote:
Hi!
I have found a nasty situation that may occurs when using composite shapes.
Consider the following script: [ b := RTMondrian new. b shape box size: 30; color: Color red trans; withText. b nodes: (1 to: 20). b edges connectFrom: [ :v | v // 3 ]. b build. RTForceBasedLayout new "doNotUseProgressBar;" on: b view elements. b view] timeToRun => 0:00:00:10.386
[ b := RTMondrian new. b shape box size: 30; color: Color red trans; withText. b nodes: (1 to: 20). b edges connectFrom: [ :v | v // 3 ]. b build. RTOptimizedForceBasedLayout new "doNotUseProgressBar;" on: b view elements. b view] timeToRun 0:00:00:00.387
Yes, on this example, the class RTOptimizedForceBasedLayout is 33 faster than the traditional layout.
The problem is that translating a composite shape is much slower than translating a non-composite shape. I have created mock elements and mock edges. That is a good news :-)
Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Speaking louder won't make the point worthier."
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev