No idea about the threshold. I find system complexity and class blueprint quite useful to
get a first impression of a system. I then usually visualize the dependencies.
If I really want to understand the system, then writing unit tests will do the thing.
Alexandre
On 24 Oct 2011, at 16:06, Ciprian Teodorov wrote:
Hi all,
I'm new to using moose for analyzing a rather large smalltalk project developed
during the last 16-17 years.
I hope that using Moose framework will give positive insights on the hot-spots of the
system in order to improve its structure, and make it more maintainable.
The project name is Madeo (
http://stiff.univ-brest.fr/BINIOU/MADEO) a FPGA
design-automation toolkit developed mainly by one of my PhD supervisors (Loic Lagadec).
To start the evaluation I believe that the overview pyramid is a very good starting point
in order to get a generic idea about the system.
However, I was not able to find any smalltalk threshold values in the moose image.
So my question is if there is somebody having some idea about the
smalltalk threshold values for the OverviewPyramid.
If yes, could you provide me these figures, and eventually point me to a scientific paper
presenting these results.
If not, I'm willing to try to get these figures myself... however I don't really
know which smalltalk projects I could use to get good results.
Thank you very much for your attention.
Best wishes,
--
PhDc Ciprian TEODOROV
Lab-STICC/AS CNRS UMR 3192
University of Brest
phone: (+33)(0) 6 08 54 73 48
mail: ciprian.teodorov(a)univ-brest.fr
www.teodorov.ro
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel
http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.