3 Dec
2009
3 Dec
'09
11:53 p.m.
On Dec 3, 2009, at 11:47 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi
extraction of literals, comments, for example
What is with them? What can we not know about them?
I do not know I was wondering if FAMIX really cover all the entity that are extracted.
At some points this was not the case
>> yes
>> the design of ImportContext predates the one of FAME and indeed we should be able
to have any metamodel and their dependency
>> Now it may happen that we will found some hidden (manually expressed in the
importingcontext and importer) dependency
>> that are not expressed in the metamodel: famix comment, literal.
>
> A related issue is to encode the importing context in the mse. So that we know what
is not in the mse.
> See comment #2 in the issue
Yes we got something a bit like that (more the metamodel) when we developed CDIF exhcngae
format.
YOu would send the mmodel and the model.
Now for the context why not.
I do not understand. What kind of details are we talking about that cannot be inferred
from the meta-model?
FAMIXComment has a container pointing to FAMIXEntity. In this case, we will probably need
to add all entities as prerequisites.
You have also FAMIXLiteral?
Doru
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing should have the right to be different."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev