[Moose-dev] Re: Status of Java annotation import with infusion/VerveineJ?

De: "Tudor Girba" <tudor.girba(a)gmail.com> À: "Moose-related development" <moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch> Envoyé: Mardi 12 Avril 2011 12:04:54 Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: Status of Java annotation import with infusion/VerveineJ? Hi Nicolas, I fixed AnnotationType and AnnotationTypeAttribute in FAMIX, but I do not know how to debug the hudson issue. What should I look at?

Cheers, Doru On 12 Apr 2011, at 10:03, Nicolas Anquetil wrote: > >> Ok. So, this means that we should have AnnotationType as a >> subclass >> of >> FAMIXType. > > yep > > >>> For some reason, Java does considers annotationType attributes >>> as >>> methods: > >>> Maybe this is because annotations are similar to interfaces and >>> interfaces don't have attribute? > >>> To me they look more like attributes, syntactically and >>> semantically > >> This is odd, indeed. But, I am not sure I understand the >> implication. >> Would it not be enough if we make AnnotationTypeAttribute a >> subclass >> of FAMIX.StructuralEntity? > > Yes it would. For the current use of AnnotationTypeAttribute, it > actually does not really matters, where they are. > However, agreeing that AnnotationType will be a Type, it would > make > sense to consider that AnnotationTypeAttribute are attributes > (i.e. > FamixAttribute) of this new Type. > So this would advocate for AnnotationTypeAttribute being a special > case of FamixAttribute. > But, this is not a very strong argument, in fine, the only > difference between a FamixAttribute and a StrucuralEntity is > 'parentType' which is just a renaming of 'belongsTo'. So both have > the same information. > > nicolas > > PS: Any idea why verveineJ tests on Hudson play the yoyo? I don't > remember commiting anything fundamental since build #16. So why is > the number of tests dropping to 0 now and then? > > Also, 15 of the 17 faulty tests in build #22 (and before) are due > to > a lacking 'getBelongsTo()' method in EnumValue: > --- > java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: > NamedEntity.getBelongsTo() > Not implemented in this class, use the proper subclass > (fr.inria.verveine.core.gen.famix.EnumValue) > --- > Something that was correct last week. So either Hudson does not > have > the corrected fr.inria.verveine.core.gen.famix code, or it is not > generating the famix.jar file or it is not using it it when it > runs > verveine. > > Could you have a look at that? > > tx > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- www.tudorgirba.com "Reasonable is what we are accustomed with." _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev