[Moose-dev] Re: Issue 999 in moose-technology: VerveineJ: management of the anonymous class

Comment #2 on issue 999 by anne.et...(a)gmail.com: VerveineJ: management of the anonymous class http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=999 Yes and no. It is true that if a class is contained in a method, VerveineJ considered it as anonymous and named it anonymous. Such a class is then considered as anonymous in Famix so everything works fine. However, (and see issue 998), when a class is contained in an enumeration (Enum), VerveineJ named it anonymous but it is not considered as such since the pattern used by VerveineJ and checked in Famix are not the same. In other terms, if we consider that the container of an anonymous class is always a method why we don't simplify the isAnonymousClass to: FAMIXType >>isAnonymousClass ^ self container isMethod If we consider that such a simplification is not possible, it means that the container of an anonymous class can be something else than a method and in that case, it would be great that VerveineJ and Famix follow the same pattern (otherwise we have some problems like in issue 998). -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://code.google.com/hosting/settings