Hi Alex,
The default version of Moose and co is faulty. There are plenty of missing requirements
and wrong dependencies. I am working on refactoring it. So, the whole versioning must be
redone after I am done.
Cheers,
Doru
On 19 Feb 2011, at 15:15, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Hi!
I think I reached a first milestone in my quest to have consistent and traceable version
in Moose. Version 4.3.3 is now defined.
I produced the versions:
- DSM 2.1
- RPackage 1.0
- Glamour 2.1
- SmallDude 2.1
I created version 4.3.2. and 4.3.3 of Moose.
- 4.3.2 uses the 'default' version of SmallDude. It is not necessary, but it
helped me to track down some problem.
- 4.3.3 does not depend on any baseline. This is an important step since it means that we
should be able to load 4.3.3 of Moose in 10 years from now, and so, whatsoever you will
commit in the dependent packages.
So, at the next commit of any packages, I will produce version 4.3.4 and so on.
The configurations were full of problems (e.g., PetitJava that does not require
PetitParser for example). This means that the validator of Metacello seriously needs to be
improved. It took me some time to identify and fix all this.
I worked with Pharo1.2OneClick image. I haven't tried with Core.
Now, the question is, should we create a hudson project to try the stable version? To
make my life simpler, I always assign the last version as the stable version. I hope this
is ok with you.
Comments are welcome
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel
http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev