24 Jul
2012
24 Jul
'12
9:14 p.m.
On Jul 23, 2012, at 11:22 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
:) it was just a joke.
I want to say that I am not sure the message is good: "you can use Moose, it is
open-source, but must pay for importing data".
You are right, this is a commercial message, and maybe it is a bonus for Synectique...
Now, I have a researcher point of view and I think that using a tool that is open source
is easier than contacting guys and maybe they answer or not. And if not ? I will use
another tool.
I only give my opinion on something that does not concern me directly.
Jannik
+1
Now what should I use ? InMoose that I do not control, or VerveineJ.... that is not open
source ?
This is stupid but maybe, I should write mine :)
give a try to see :)
again we were planning to have a license so that verveineJ is usable for close friends.
I'm sorry but we do not want to give everything for free all the time.
Stef
---
Jannik Laval
Jannik
On Jul 23, 2012, at 1:28 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Sure. But, you see, even Jannik who is an Moose
insider misunderstood
the status of VerveineJ. This means we have to be more clear somehow.
I added now explicitly a line saying that there is a commercial license.
Should I remove the pointer of how to checkout the source as well?
Doru
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
<stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote:
---
Jannik Laval
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev For us we will continue to work on verveineJ and
the license will stay like that for a while until we know were we go.
So for us verveineJ is important because we can control it, fix it…
Stef
> Hi Jannik,
>
>>> Some questions:
>>> - is there any reason to support vervainJ instead of InFamix ? Would it make
sense to support both ?
>>
>> This is a long discussion. I know that VerveinJ works fine. It is open-soure and
well-maintained.
>> Maybe Nicolas Anquetil has already done a comparison between the two importers.
>
> Unfortunately, VerveineJ is not open-source. It is at the moment
> available to be used, but as it stands, the license is not specified
> at all. This is why the page says that you should contact Stef for
> getting information about the license. It would be great to clarify
> this point to avoid confusion in the future :).
>
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev