On Sep 2, 2017, at 5:43 PM, Thierry Goubier
<thierry.goubier(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Doru,
Le 01/09/2017 à 23:51, Tudor Girba a écrit :
Hi,
When we announced the GT Documenter as an application for the moldable editor, one of the
remarks was that GT Examples implementation relies too much on pragma magic.
We are now happy to announce that this is no longer the case because Andrei did a great
job and rebuilt examples without the need for static pragmas for specifying dependencies.
Thinking of it, I'm sure that analysis is nearly able to establish something is a
proper example without even the <gtExample> tag…
Not all returning unary methods are meaningful examples. <gtExample> denotes the
intention of using a certain code and returning object as an example.
Doru
Regards,
Thierry
So, now we can example dependencies simply
through normal calls:
emptyView
<gtExample>
^ GtMondrian new
twoNodes
<gtExamples>
view := self emptyView
view nodes with: {1 . 2}
... and the engine can figure out the static dependencies. This means that examples can
be used both as plain unary methods, and as replacement for tests. We think this should
address the worry of examples being too heavy (the current implementation is ~350 lines).
With a bit of extra effort, we also adapted GT Documenter to expand the example
dependencies as seen below. This means that examples can now be used directly as units of
documentation as well.
We think this is significant.
Cheers,
The feenk team
--
www.tudorgirba.com <http://www.tudorgirba.com>
www.feenk.com
"We are all great at making mistakes."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev