Another point that was raised in discussions here, is related to
Package.
In the first day of re-modeling :), Package had a superclass called
DeployableEntity, but then we could not really find another subclass
that cannot be modeled as Package.
Also we could not find a good name for the superclass: Deployable
means it can be deployed, but we need a name that also says that
things can be put/deployed in it.
So, all in all we removed the class. But, if any of you can give some
good candidates for stuff that is similar to Package, we can put it in.
Just to show that we discussed a bit :), Jar does not really fit in
this hierarchy, but rather in a FileSystem hierarchy, in which
entities can be filedIn, and not packagedIn.
Cheers,
Doru
On Oct 18, 2007, at 4:05 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
To open the discussion, I vote to rename
StructuralEntity to
VariableEntity :).
Doru
On Oct 18, 2007, at 4:03 PM, Toon Verwaest wrote:
Hi,
Find in attachment the first open draft version of the FAMIX 3.0
metamodel. Review and comments welcomed!
cheers,
Toon<FAMIX3.0.pdf>_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.iam.unibe.ch/~girba
www.iam.unibe.ch/~girba/blog/
"Sometimes the best solution is not the best solution."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.iam.unibe.ch/~girba
www.iam.unibe.ch/~girba/blog/
"No matter how many recipes we'll know, we'll still value a chef."