Hi Stef,
How did they parse the C++ system?
Doru
On 18 Jun 2010, at 10:38, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Begin forwarded message:
From: Henrik Johansen
<henrik.s.johansen(a)veloxit.no>
Date: June 18, 2010 10:01:53 AM GMT+02:00
To: Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>
Subject: Re: PDF of Software Metrics
What he was most interested in, was the C++ thresholds for the
overview pyramid in Moose.
Found those in an online presentation, so wasn't as pressing
after all :)
Is there any reason why only JavaThresholds are included/used by
default, instead of being selected automatically based on what
language your model originated from?
On the bright side, he's found the tools really useful (doing an
architectural review of a large C++ program) after I tipped him
of the existence of Moose :)
Mondrian visualizations do not scale very well for a project of
this size though, the display model seems more geared towards
traversing the model rather than culling what does not show up on
screen, which turns into a problem when it redraws 50000 nodes
each refresh rather than the 100 - 200 actually visible on
screen... (ie. 8-10 seconds for one refresh after clicking
scroll bars) (This was an enriched DSM chart for 20 namespaces)
The blueprint complexity visualization never even opened (as in,
at least in the first minute), the algorithm for calculating
edges is waaay too slow with 500 entities :)
Which is kind of a shame, since those large, complex systems are
what it really would be nice to have good visualizations of... :/
Maybe better scaleability would be a good goal for Moose 4.1?
Cheers,
Henry
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
"Speaking louder won't make the point worthier."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch