> yes
> the design of ImportContext predates the one of FAME and indeed
> we should be able to have any metamodel and their dependency
> Now it may happen that we will found some hidden (manually
> expressed in the importingcontext and importer) dependency
> that are not expressed in the metamodel: famix comment, literal.
A related issue is to encode the importing context in the mse. So
that we know what is not in the mse.
See comment #2 in the issue
Yes we got something a bit like that (more the metamodel) when we
developed CDIF exhcngae format.
YOu would send the mmodel and the model.
Now for the context why not.
I do not understand. What kind of details are we talking about that
cannot be inferred from the meta-model?