Hi,
We have no interest in playing politics in any way. That is why we are making explicit
both our aims and the ways in which we work.
As I mentioned, we work as a team and our goal is specifically to offer a different
alternative to approaching programming. At the moment, this is different from the goal of
Pharo, although the two are likely not incompatible. Interestingly, this goal is not far
from the work that happened around Moose. Humane assessment was born in the Moose context,
and in fact, the first GT was developed for several years in the context of Moose as
well.
The most concrete thing that people see from our current effort is the new GT interface,
but we are building other things as well. First, GT has tools inside that are interesting
for other purposes. We mentioned recently Releaser, a new tool that we think solves a
significant problem in Pharo. Also, the Examples engine might be interesting, too. And so
is the Bloc stack in which we invested heavily. Less obvious is that we have created xdoc,
a format and associated technology for sharing executable documents. We also develop the
moldable development approach that is enabled by the new kinds of tools.
From a concrete perspective, indeed, we are only relying on about half of the current
Pharo (the language&runtime, but not the graphics&environment). At the same time,
most code we build is available as open-source in ways that are compatible with Pharo both
from a license and from a technical perspective. At present time, our code loads cleanly
and works in the latest Pharo without any modifications required for Pharo.
While we love working in Pharo, we are not the ones that decide its course, and we leave
the decisions of what will happen with Pharo with the Pharo team.
Cheers,
Doru
On Dec 28, 2018, at 4:44 PM, Tim Mackinnon
<tim(a)mackinnon.email> wrote:
I had a similar question - is this a heads-up of a future fork (and a future commercial
offering?). Or is it more like there will be Pharo lean/dev (the current pharo) and a
fuller/fatter Feenk, that is pharo based but augments with a richer set of tools? Or are
we experimenting with a potential new pharo direction that drops the existing tools if the
community likes it?
Either way - I like the work, I just want to be careful of any politics.
Tim
On Sat, 22 Dec 2018, at 4:58 PM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
Tudor Girba-2 wrote
The current version runs inside the Pharo UI
because we need to bootstrap.
But, our goal is to build a complete IDE on the new stack.
Does this mean it will offer Pharo an alternative UI (what I think you
mean), or that the final product will not be Pharo-based?
-----
Cheers,
Sean
--
Sent from:
http://forum.world.st/Moose-f1310756.html
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.feenk.com
"To lead is not to demand things, it is to make them happen."