7 Apr
2015
7 Apr
'15
7:43 p.m.
I thing that it makes sense to create execution indicator without progress (with spinner
for example). It can’t be done easily now, but maybe in pharo 5 we can change how jobs are
displayed.
One more progress that I want to have is to display a number of “steps". Sometimes
number can increase, so progress bar is not really suitable, but we would be able to at
least indicate the number of remaining steps.
Uko
On 07 Apr 2015, at 17:55, Peter Uhnák
<i.uhnak(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
from what I've seen when digging through layouts, the slowest part is
RTForceBasedLayout>>doExecute:, however there is whileTrue: loop so there is no
knowing when it will stop.
So is there some "unknown status" progress bar? That would be useful here.
Because for example RTRectanglePackLayout uses do:displaingProgress: to show the
progress, but it knows when it will end. That would have to be adapted for whileTrue: and
unknown sizes.
Peter
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Natalia Tymchuk <natalia.tymchuk(a)unikernel.net
<mailto:natalia.tymchuk@unikernel.net>> wrote:
Hello.
As we all know Force based layout is quite slow. For example if I use it for more that
200 points it takes ages and during that time I’m not even sure if it works or no.
So I wonder maybe it will be better to draw progress bar during the time it works?
Thanks.
Best regards,
Natalia
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch <mailto:Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch>
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
<https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev>
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev