10 Oct
2007
10 Oct
'07
1:27 p.m.
Hi Adrian
EMOF has the advantage that it is nowadays a quasi standard. Dealing
with a new model makes it easier to realize your new ideas, making
performance optimization, etc. but harder to interact / exchange with
other tools. Consider this while making your decision.
All the best
Frank
Adrian Kuhn wrote:
Dear Moosers,
I was pondering over Famix and found that it only uses 20% of EMOF's
features. As it seems, the E in EMOF is not really standing for
essential :)
What I came up with when porting MSE to Java, is a much simpler mmmodel.
I documented it on the wiki
http://smallwiki.unibe.ch/moose/mse/msemmmodel/
would be nice to make this the new mmmodel of moose and get rid of
all the EMOF bloat.
by the way, a Java implementation is in its first draft, if you are
interested contact me.
cheers,
AA
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev