25 Nov
2007
25 Nov
'07
3:13 p.m.
I thought about it and I would like to have
java package -> extracted as package
smalltalk package -> as package
smalltalk namespace -> as namespace
Is it what you had in mind?
Stef
On 25 nov. 07, at 13:51, Tudor Girba wrote:
In the latest FAMIX proposed by Adrian, Package and
Namespaces are
both ScopedEntities. The reason for this is exactly to not clone the
code in both namespace and in package.
I am not sure that I like that though because the semantics of Package
is not the one of Scoped.
Doru
On Nov 25, 2007, at 1:39 PM, stephane ducasse wrote:
Hi
I'm about to write a new package reference plugin for moose.
Now I have to pay attention because of the way namespaces and
packages are orthogonal in Smalltalk.
I have a question:
when we will be loading java code in Moose what will be a Java
package?
a moose namespace or a moose package?
If this is a namespace then I will have certainly to duplicate the
logic in package and namespace and I would like
to avoid that. Does anybody have an idea how to avoid that?
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"It's not how it is, it is how we see it."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev