29 Jul
2016
29 Jul
'16
9:15 p.m.
Le 29/7/16 à 14:38, Serge Stinckwich a écrit :
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Thierry Goubier
<thierry.goubier(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I asked John and he told me that we could use the material
of his
tutorial to produce
docs and chapter. There is a chapter in the PharoInProgress waiting for
reviews.
I would like to add an example on how to parse tab based language.
Hi Sven,
I'd put RB + SmaCC among the lot. But I consider that really non-trivial :
the pattern language of RB (and the underlying pattern matching and
unification algorithm) is top notch, and how SmaCC builds on RB to virtually
generate code / optimise code / then compile is nothing short of amazing.
SmaCC comes with a pattern matching/unification algorithm over ASTs +
auto-generation of AST code + visitor + tree equality + the equivalent of
Flex/Bison(*) + a GUI in 11401 lines of code.
SmaCC deserves definitively more
advertisements and should be added to
MOOSE platform I think.
When I see all the buzz around languages workbenches like Rascal:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ffx7VtEOSx4
This is not the same Rascal has a pattern-matching and relationship
queries.
with MOOSE+RB+SmaCC+Reflectivity+GTools we are close
to these tools
(or even better).
Regards,