[Moose-dev] Re: Mondrian Health report and new version of Mondrian

Strange. I cannot reproduce the issue. It works properly with me. Jannik, can you try to open a system complexity please? Cheers, Alexandre On 16 Jul 2010, at 10:56, Tudor Girba wrote: > Hi Alex, > > The new version creates serious problems for system complexity: > everything appears double. See the attachment. > > Also, in the blueprint, the bounds are again cropping the top > and the left side of the visualization. > > I tested both with the Cog and with regular VM. > > Cheers, > Doru > > <Picture 1.png> > > > > On 16 Jul 2010, at 10:27, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > >>> thanks alex >>> we are really stressing mondrian with our crazy ideas. >> >> Package blueprint was indeed interesting. >> Thousands of small nodes contained in a large node, big enough >> to not be cached using the former system. Large nodes are now >> bitmap cached even if they are partially displayed. It looks >> obvious, but converging to this solution took time... >> >> Thanks for all your bug report. >> >> Cheers, >> Alexandre >> >>> >>> On Jul 16, 2010, at 9:31 AM, Alexandre Bergel wrote: >>> >>>> Dear Mondrian friends, >>>> >>>> A new cache mechanism has been implemented and some part have >>>> been simplified. The goal was to make Package blueprint fast >>>> without reducing the speed up for other visualization. The >>>> goal has been reached. On my machine, Package Blueprint is >>>> snappy (as soon as it got displayed and you do not select >>>> anything). >>>> >>>> The health report shown below is sensibly the same than the >>>> one sent few days ago. However, the new benchmark ("Benchmark >>>> many small nodes") is the one that reproduce a situation >>>> found in package blueprint. It was costly before this version. >>>> >>>> I would like you to try the last version of Mondrian. I >>>> tested it against class blueprint and it behaves as it >>>> should. However, you may notice some differences. Was the >>>> rendering and scrolling faster for you? Are you happy with >>>> this new version? >>>> >>>> >>>> Report produced on 2010-07-16T09:13:19+02:00 >>>> System version Pharo-1.1-11400-rc2 of 12 June 2010 update 11400 >>>> Benchmark ManyNode (simple rendering of nodes) : >>>> 100 nodes => 7 ms >>>> 200 nodes => 12 ms >>>> 300 nodes => 18 ms >>>> 400 nodes => 23 ms >>>> 500 nodes => 30 ms >>>> 600 nodes => 35 ms >>>> 700 nodes => 41 ms >>>> 800 nodes => 46 ms >>>> 900 nodes => 52 ms >>>> 1000 nodes => 58 ms >>>> 1600 nodes => 93 ms >>>> 3200 nodes => 186 ms >>>> 6400 nodes => 373 ms >>>> Benchmark ManyEdges (simple rendering of edges) : >>>> 10 edges => 3 ms >>>> 20 edges => 9 ms >>>> 30 edges => 21 ms >>>> 40 edges => 38 ms >>>> 50 edges => 65 ms >>>> 60 edges => 102 ms >>>> 70 edges => 153 ms >>>> 80 edges => 223 ms >>>> 90 edges => 310 ms >>>> 100 edges => 409 ms >>>> 200 edges => 5844 ms >>>> 300 edges => 37619 ms >>>> Benchmark ManyInnerNodes : >>>> 5 nodes => 170 ms >>>> 10 nodes => 3012 ms >>>> 15 nodes => 11589 ms >>>> Benchmark Displaying ManyInnerNodes : >>>> 5 nodes => 152 ms >>>> 10 nodes => 1526 ms >>>> 15 nodes => 11186 ms >>>> Benchmark Displaying ManyInnerNodesAndEdges : >>>> 1 nodes => 9 ms >>>> 2 nodes => 239 ms >>>> 3 nodes => 3278 ms >>>> 4 nodes => 30492 ms >>>> Benchmark Displaying elementAt : >>>> 100 nodes => 3 ms >>>> 500 nodes => 5 ms >>>> 1000 nodes => 9 ms >>>> 1500 nodes => 11 ms >>>> 2000 nodes => 14 ms >>>> 2500 nodes => 16 ms >>>> Benchmark many small nodes : >>>> 2000 nodes => 2368 ms >>>> >>>> -- >>>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >>>> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >>>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Moose-dev mailing list >>>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Moose-dev mailing list >>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev >> >> -- >> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Moose-dev mailing list >> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?" > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev