20 Jan
2017
20 Jan
'17
6:11 p.m.
Not only, they are used, I think, also in the MoosePanel. And if you want to generate a
tool that can be used for different metamodel, as MooseQuery or OrionGenerator, you need
the pragmas.
<multivalued> and <derived> also.
We are currently working with Pavel to define more easily metamodels without pragmas and
FMMultivalueLink.
Anne
Le 20 janv. 2017 à 15:18, Alexandre Bergel
<alexandre.bergel(a)me.com> a écrit :
Really?
Does it mean that the pragmas contained in:
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
FAMIXType>>subInheritances
<MSEProperty: #subInheritances type: #FAMIXInheritance opposite: #superclass>
<multivalued> <derived>
<MSEComment: 'Subinheritance relationships, i.e. known subclasses of this
type.'>
^subInheritances
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Are only for the import / export?
<multivalued>, <derived> ?
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
On Jan 20, 2017, at 7:24 AM, Tudor Girba
<tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Hi,
Pragmas are only useful when you want to export/import. They are also used a bit for
navigation but that use can be easily replaced with dedicated inspector panes. So, if you
do not have the import/export use case, you do not need the pragmas.
Cheers,
Doru
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev On Jan 19, 2017, at 11:06 PM, Nicolas Anquetil
<Nicolas.Anquetil(a)inria.fr> wrote:
+1
On 19/01/2017 18:37, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.feenk.com
“The smaller and more pervasive the hardware becomes, the more physical the software
gets."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev As a bit off the topic, I have always questioned
myself to using pragmas.
Are pragmas a mechanism we should continue to have to define a meta-model? Most of the
time, I am better at implementing a simple meta-model without famix at all than trying to
understand pragmas.
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
> On Jan 19, 2017, at 8:23 AM, Anne Etien <anne.etien(a)univ-lille1.fr> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am developing a tool based on Fame pragma.
> Considering the following methods:
> FAMIXSQLExpression >>referencedRequests
> <MSEProperty: #referencedRequests type: #FAMIXRequest opposite:
#usedInExpression> <multivalued>
> <MSEComment: 'List of requests referenced by the expression.'>
> ^ referencedRequests
>
> FAMIXRequest >>usedInExpression
> <MSEProperty: #usedInExpression type: #FAMIXSQLExpression opposite:
#referencedRequests>
> <MSEComment: 'Expression in which the request is used.'>
> ^ usedInExpression
>
> (FAMIXSQLExpression mooseDescription at: 'referencedRequests') hasOpposite
should return true.
> However, I don’t have always the same behavior after each resetMeta.
> (1 to: 100) do: [ : e | MooseModel resetMeta. (FAMIXSQLExpression mooseDescription
at: 'referencedRequests') hasOpposite ifFalse: [ 1halt ] ].
> always halts, at some unpredictable iteration (usually less than 10)
>
> Does someone has any idea what is the problem and how to solve it?
>
> By the way, MooseSQL is available here https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/MooseSQL/
>
> Thanks in advance for your help.
>
> Anne
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
> https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Nicolas Anquetil -- MCF (HDR)
Project-Team RMod
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev