15 Mar
2011
15 Mar
'11
1:50 p.m.
On Mar 15, 2011, at 13:28 , Simon Denier wrote:
What are the problems exactly?
One thing would be to add a Mse version metadata in each file. I think Cyrille has
started something similar.
Yes, we should do that.
But, if we want to keep versions of mse files, we should keep also the possibility to load
them.
Now, it is not possible.
The idea of changing major version is to say: pay attention, changes are important, and we
are making tools to move in the new version.
This is what we did with Cyrille from Famix2 to Famix3.
Jannik
Simon
On 15 mars 2011, at 12:52, "jannik.laval" <jannik.laval(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi all,
We are using Moose 4.3 and we have lots of problems due to the metamodel changes from 4.1
to 4.3.
For example all my mse files generated in 4.1 are obsolete in 4.3, but we develop tools
in 4.3 not compatible with 4.1.
The situation is not really cool, and the message sent by this problem also.
To solve this problem, I would propose to replace the version 4.3 by a version 5.0.
Like that we can build tools to move from version 4.x to 5.x.
And the message is better.
What is your opinion about these changes and what is the impact on the community ?
Thanks
Jannik
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev