Hi,
This is great! I particularly liked the hovering.
There are a couple of things that would be great to be extended:
- The cells with no dependency are not particularly relevant, and they should appear transparent. Hovering can still remain.
- The order has to be improved. To this end, take a look at the DSM work of Jannik. At the end, he extracted the algorithm in separate packages: Gofer new smalltalkhubUser: 'Moose' project: 'DSM'; package: 'Moose-Algos-Dsm' package: 'Moose-Dsm-Core'; package: 'Moose-Dsm-Example'; package: 'Moose-Dsm-Famix'; load The code does not seem to work anymore in Moose 6.0, but it would be great to salvage at least the basics and add that into Moose-Algos (which ideally would become a prerequisite for Roassal :)).
- We also need the cyclic information. Actually, adding cycles would be probably enough as an ordering. In Moose-Algos, we have the MalTarjan algorithm which is also the one used as a basis by the old DSM implementation of Jannik. You can see an example of it in: MooseGroup>>cyclesToAll: aBlockOrUnarySymbol This one allows you to have something like: aGroupOfClasses cyclesToAll: #clientClasses and you will get Collections of cyclic groups.
- Once we have cyclic information, this has to appear on the diagram, and ideally it should be clickable to be able to dive into a cycle.
What do you think?
Cheers, Doru
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 10:19 PM, Alexandre Bergel alexandre.bergel@me.com wrote:
Hi!
Roassal has a new builder called RTDSM. It is currently very basic. Here is an example:
dsm := RTDSM new. dsm objects: RTShape withAllSubclasses. dsm dependency: #dependentClasses.
produces the following:
Are there some algorithms to find an optimal ordering of the elements to display?
Here is a slightly bigger matrix Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
