Hi,
The plan is to create a Moose/Moose51 repository and have all Moose 5.1
specific patches committed there. When a new version is wanted, the #stable
ConfigrationOfMoose for Pharo 4 will be updated with the new packages by
the one that needs that version.
For example, suppose that after the release of 5.1, you need a patch in
Moose-Core:
- You publish a new Moose-Core in Moose/Moose51
- You create a version511 in ConfigurationOfMoose
- You change the #stable to point to that version
Would that be Ok?
Cheers,
Doru
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Blondeau Vincent <
vincent.blondeau(a)worldline.com> wrote:
Hi,
Will we be able to push some patches/features to the 5.1 version of Moose
easily ?
Cheers,
Vincent
*De :* moose-dev-bounces(a)iam.unibe.ch [mailto:
moose-dev-bounces(a)iam.unibe.ch] *De la part de* Andrei Chis
*Envoyé :* mardi 19 mai 2015 10:39
*À :* Moose-related development
*Objet :* [Moose-dev] Re: Moose on Pharo 5
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 1:47 AM, Andrei Chis <chisvasileandrei(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi,
A few more steps towards releasing moose 5.1:
- create version 5.1 for ConfigurationOfMoose
- updated
ConfigurationOfMooseAlgos
ConfigurationOfFame
ConfigurationOfRoassal2
ConfigurationOfMerlin
ConfigurationOfDeepTraversal
- the jenkins job for moose5.1 now loads #stable
- created a new job that loads moose #development on pharo 5
Still to do:
- ConfigurationOfSmallDude seems strange
- fixed
- check again that all packages in GT-* are up to date
- fixed
- fix moose5.0 build
- for some strange reason monticello decides to load Glamour 3.3.0
instead of Glamour 3.0.6 when loading moose #stable in Pharo 3
The build is now green.
The initial issue is still there. I just removed some versions from
ConfigurationOfGlamour
- there is a strange issue with ConfigurationOfRubric and monticello.
I still have no idea what is the cause of this bug, but Rubric gets
updated correctly. So I would not say it's a show stopper.
So I think we can release.
Cheers,
Andrei
Cheers,
Andrei
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel <
alexandre.bergel(a)me.com> wrote:
Hi!
I see a lot of negative comments recently. In any company that produces a
sizable software system there is at least one person dedicated to
versioning, building, and packaging.
Unfortunately, the setting used by Moose is still far from optimal. It
would be nice to improve this, and this has to be done with a positive
energy.
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel
http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
On May 11, 2015, at 10:36 AM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Hi,
Perhaps something was not clear.
I did not say that everyone should work on the latest Moose. We go through
the (painful) trouble of creating stable versions exactly because we want
to offer the alternative of depending on something that does not change.
But, if someone wants support this will be provided on the latest Moose
because this is where the development activity is. This will happen on the
latest Pharo because especially now that GT is adopted in Pharo, the
development effort is too close to be practical to support two different
branches. Before Moose 5.0 we tried for a while to maintain GT for both
Pharo 3 and deal with changes in Pharo 4 and we do not want to go through
this again. This might change if the tool support changes.
Now, if someone wants to backport changes to an older Moose version, we
can put in place a separate repository that can host those backported
changes.
Cheers,
Tudor
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Nicolas Anquetil <
nicolas.anquetil(a)inria.fr> wrote:
Just to explain,
we try to make a living by building on top of Moose
we try to adapt it to the lambda Cobol developper that may not be
interested in learning a new syntax
So the simplest change in Moose can sometimes break everything for us.
As Usman explained, we cannot test again each morning every single feature
we already implemented for every language we support.
So having a bleeding edge Moose for us is not a solution
nicolas
On 11/05/2015 11:12, Usman Bhatti wrote:
Hi,
In Synectique's case, we had several problems working with Bleeding edge
of Moose:
1/ changes to the API
2/ changes that lead to performance problems
3/ when depending on bleeding edge of Pharo always testing the combo Pharo
+ Moose
The first one is important because one does not want to spend resources
adapting to inadvertent changes. And it is easy to handle as one can always
depend on a given version number (not a stable because it is moving and may
create surprises that are less frequent than the bleeding edge).
Regarding changes that lead to performance issues, someone must test with
real cases and evaluate. Depending on the version number works fine here
too.
We would not have needed to create our own configuration if we could
downgrade PetitParser but apparently, that is not possible and hence the
easier solution was to create our own configuration.
The ConfigurationOfSynectiqueMoose is just an assembly of existing
versions of the components in Moose (these versions are published
publicly). We just loading by hand:
-> SmallDude because it has a dependency on ConfigurationOfMoose
-> GT-Toolkit and PetitSQL because there were paths leading to PetitParser
#development.
As for Moose depending on the bleeding edge of Pharo, it is risky business
because when demoing or delivering a new version to a client, the red
square of death is difficult to justify. With the stable version, we at
least know where not to click :p. But one is not testing new combinations
(coming from Pharo + Moose) in production.
But if there are alternate solutions in our eco-system that enable the use
of bleeding edge in production that shield the users from inadvertent
changes, it'll be nice to know.
regards,
Usman
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 11:03 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Hi,
Yes, I think we have a different point of view on what Moose is.
I do not expect people to fork, but if they do, I would expect them to do
it in a public place and help us maintain the configuration(s). For
example, we could have:
- a Moose/Moose51 repository
- commit packages with new patches for Moose 5.1 only there, and
- modify the #stable version corresponding configurations to load those
new packages.
This is doable. Would that be Ok?
Cheers,
Doru
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 9:43 PM, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote:
Just a question.
Do you expect people needing to have stable version to fork and work in
their corners?
I do not get why Moose dev should systematically be under the bleeding
edge of Pharo.
I probably do not understand what Moose is.
Stef
Le 5/5/15 19:17, Tudor Girba a écrit :
Please do not do this until we release. The reason is that this will
generate more commits that will be specific to pharo 5, like the current
substring problem in get inspector.
The goal is to release this or next week, and then we move to pharo 5.
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
On 05 May 2015, at 19:52, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel(a)me.com>
wrote:
Anyone who has access to the CI can do this?
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel
http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
On May 5, 2015, at 8:59 AM, Andrei Chis <chisvasileandrei(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi Alexandre,
Right now now we're updating configurations and fixing the remaining
issues to be able to release moose 5.1
We can in parallel start a build for Pharo 5 but we do not have to much
time to invest in it (apart from starting it) until we release.
Cheers,
Andrei
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel(a)me.com>
wrote:
Hi!
Is there any plan to move on Pharo 5?
Can someone trigger a build?
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel
http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
------------------------------
Ce message et les pièces jointes sont confidentiels et réservés à l'usage
exclusif de ses destinataires. Il peut également être protégé par le secret
professionnel. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, merci d'en avertir
immédiatement l'expéditeur et de le détruire. L'intégrité du message ne
pouvant être assurée sur Internet, la responsabilité de Worldline ne pourra
être recherchée quant au contenu de ce message. Bien que les meilleurs
efforts soient faits pour maintenir cette transmission exempte de tout
virus, l'expéditeur ne donne aucune garantie à cet égard et sa
responsabilité ne saurait être recherchée pour tout dommage résultant d'un
virus transmis.
This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended
solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this
e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As
its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Worldline liability
cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours
to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that
this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages
resulting from any virus transmitted.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev