21 Jul
2016
21 Jul
'16
5:36 p.m.
On 21/07/2016 17:28, Anne Etien wrote:
Hi,
As Stéphane announced it, we have an engineer position for two years to
modify FAME and FAMIX to make them more easily adaptable… and to adapt
existing tools to this new core. So perhaps, somethings could be done in
parallel, but in the opposite, perhaps, we should not take too much time
to modify the current version since we will rebuild a new one.
Anne
PS: I am writing the position description to send it to the list and
audition interested people in ESUG.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
Hi Anne,
I think that we should not wait to correct this kind of things because
most of the problems are not related to FAMIX but are general problems
of any project. If we have people that are willing to help cutting bad
dependencies and improving the configurations, that will let more time
to the engineer to work on the model itself.
I think it would be good at ESUG to make a sort of roadmap of the things
to do (for example I would like Moose-Core to be cut into
FAMIX-Importers, FAMIX-Presentation, FAMIX-Critics,
FAMIX-AbstractModel…). With that roadmap we could begin to clean and
when the engineer will be here he will know what to do next.
Thanks to RMoD for helping Moose to improve!
--
Cyril Ferlicot
http://www.synectique.eu
165 Avenue Bretagne
Lille 59000 France