There are a couple of things that would be great to be extended:
- The cells with no dependency are not particularly relevant, and they should appear transparent. Hovering can still remain.
I made them lighter. Before:
Now:
Indeed, looks better.
I have tried with no color:
But I kind of miss the directing lines.
- The order has to be improved. To this end, take a look at the DSM work of Jannik. At the end, he extracted the algorithm in separate packages:
Gofer new smalltalkhubUser: 'Moose' project: 'DSM'; package: 'Moose-Algos-Dsm' package: 'Moose-Dsm-Core'; package: 'Moose-Dsm-Example'; package: 'Moose-Dsm-Famix'; load The code does not seem to work anymore in Moose 6.0, but it would be great to salvage at least the basics and add that into Moose-Algos (which ideally would become a prerequisite for Roassal :)).
I just had a look at it. Not easy to understand.
- We also need the cyclic information. Actually, adding cycles would be probably enough as an ordering. In Moose-Algos, we have the MalTarjan algorithm which is also the one used as a basis by the old DSM implementation of Jannik. You can see an example of it in: MooseGroup>>cyclesToAll: aBlockOrUnarySymbol
This one allows you to have something like: aGroupOfClasses cyclesToAll: #clientClasses and you will get Collections of cyclic groups.
- Once we have cyclic information, this has to appear on the diagram, and ideally it should be clickable to be able to dive into a cycle.
What do you think?
Look exciting! However it appears to be more than a few minutes of coding. Next semester I will surely have some new students working with me. This will be a task.
Cheers, Alexandre
Cheers, Doru
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 10:19 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel@me.com mailto:alexandre.bergel@me.com> wrote: Hi!
Roassal has a new builder called RTDSM. It is currently very basic. Here is an example:
dsm := RTDSM new. dsm objects: RTShape withAllSubclasses. dsm dependency: #dependentClasses.
produces the following: <Screen Shot 2015-08-12 at 5.05.44 PM.png>
Are there some algorithms to find an optimal ordering of the elements to display?
Here is a slightly bigger matrix <Screen Shot 2015-08-12 at 5.14.13 PM.png> Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu http://www.bergel.eu/ ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch mailto:Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- www.tudorgirba.com http://www.tudorgirba.com/
"Every thing has its own flow" _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
