[Moose-dev] Re: confused by MSE is it moose or mse?

Hi, I am happy that finally someone would like to have a dialog about these issues :). The idea was to name it MSE because this was the name of the format. But, I also wanted before to name it FM3. Regarding the use of <package:>, the idea was that this is just an add-on to another annotation. For example, if you have a <MSEClass:> then you can optionally add a <package:> that is interpreted in the context of the defined <MSEClass:>. The problem with this approach is that they use common names that pollute the overall pragma space (given that pragmas are global). So, I would prefix package: with FM3Package:. Actually, there are a couple of more pragmas used that should be renamed as well: - <multivalued> - <derived> - <container> Cheers, Doru On 23 Sep 2011, at 22:10, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow."