23 Nov
2007
23 Nov
'07
9:39 p.m.
Without thinking through all implications, me also.
In the long term, I'd favor to model "sides" of classes as some first
level entity ... introducing "group side" als die Dritte im Bunde.
But that is for a future FAMIX extension package.
AA
On 23 Nov 2007, at 21:34 , stephane ducasse wrote:
testInstanceAndClassSideWhenMergingClassAndMetaclass
| node |
node := self model entityNamed:
#'Root::Smalltalk::ReferenceModel::TheRoot'.
self assert: (self model entityNamed:
#'Root::Smalltalk::ReferenceModel::TheRoot_class' ifAbsent: [nil])
isNil.
self assert: node instanceSide == node.
self assert: node classSide == nil.
nil or node ?
I would prefer node so that we get a circular situation
Stef
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev