13 Mar
2014
13 Mar
'14
2 p.m.
remember that Moose is a "data Analysis
platform" it is not only for software, so yes somebody not working with software can
use it.
I know, but actually, I am finding myself using the moose image essentially for
GTInspector and Playground. Much more than moose itself. The Moose image is offering
something else in addition to Moose, and I think we should embrace this better.
Alexandre
I have no particular objection to change the name except that changing name means you
restart from scratch and have to re-explain to people what it is ...
nicolas
On 13/03/2014 13:46, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Hi!
The Moose image offers much more than offering moose. For example, I have a postdoc
working on Astronomy images and she is using the moose image not because of moose, but
because of what is shipped with it.
Does something who is not interested in analyzing software may find the moose image
useful? The answer is absolutely yes.
What about changing the name of the Moose image into something closer to what it really
offer?
Maybe Pharo4Modelling ? PharoModellingEdition?
I think this discussion is important.
Cheers,
Alexandre
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev