28 Oct
2015
28 Oct
'15
2:05 p.m.
Do you also have an algorithm laying out your UML diagrams?
Not yet. Next month I should have something custom-tailored for class
diagrams...
Peter
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote:
The bug is in Glamour as it seems.
For example:
GLMWrapper new with: [ :w |
w show: [ :a |
a roassal2
*title: 'With title it works';*
initializeView: [ RTMondrian new ];
painting: [ :view |
view nodes: (1 to: 10) ] ] ];
openOn: 42
If the bolded line is there, you get the actions, if not, they are not.
Doru
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel(a)me.com
wrote:
For preparing my teaching course I would have
love to have simple class
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
hierarchy visualisations or even better, real UML
representations.
Unfortunately, the UML like diagram from the Moose panel is not zoomable.
There is a bug in the rendering of actions in the main window.
Yes, but I cannot figure out what it is. I have simply
refactored GLMRoassal2Presentation>>defaultActions
I believe the behavior should be the same.
Can you have a look at it?
Cheers,
Alexandre
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev