As I use a lot of CompositeShape in my project I will give you a lot of
feedbacks ;-)
I like the composition of composite shape itself. I needed it now it will
so much easier.
But is it possible the put a RTCompositeShape as fixed ? Let me give you an
example to show you
I'm working on a Menu in my vizualisation so i want them fix. But a menu is
a label and its "background' so a composite shape. Can I set it as fixed ?
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Alexandre Bergel
<alexandre.bergel(a)me.com>wrote;wrote:
Hi!
I’ve just introduced a new class TRExtensibleLabelShape and TRLabelShape.
This will ease the problem we are experiencing with using labels in a
composed shape.
I would like now to discuss about how to compose shapes. This has been a
big discussion for at least 5 years. I propose a solution in this email, I
hope this will make most of us happy :-)
Consider the example:
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
| v s1 s2 c es |
v := RTView new.
s1 := (RTEllipse new size: #yourself; color: (Color blue alpha: 0.4)).
s2 := (RTLabel new text: 'Hello World'; height: 10).
c := RTCompositeShape new
shape1: s1;
shape2: s2;
offset2: 0 @ -30.
es := c elementsOn: #(30 60 80).
es @ RTDraggable.
v addAll: es.
es when: TRMouseClick do: [ :evt | evt element remove. v signalUpdate ].
RTHorizontalLineLayout on: v elements.
v open
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
This is the output:
If you click on an element, then the element with its label is properly
removed. Yupi! Leo will be happy with that :-)
The reason is that how can I specify to have s2 above s1? What should I
put in offset2 ? Instead of fiddling with blocks like [:shape1 :shape2
:element | … ] I have introduced RTHorizontalCompositeShape
and RTVerticalCompositeShape just to try whether it make sense or not.
We can have
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
| v s1 s2 c es |
v := RTView new.
s1 := (RTEllipse new size: #yourself; color: (Color blue alpha: 0.4)).
s2 := (RTLabel new text: 'Hello World'; height: 10).
c := RTHorizontalCompositeShape new
shape1: s1;
shape2: s2.
es := c elementsOn: #(30 60 80).
es @ RTDraggable.
v addAll: es.
RTHorizontalLineLayout on: v elements.
v
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Replacing Horizontal by Vertical works as expected.
You can also compose these things. Look at that:
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
| v s1 s2 c es |
v := RTView new.
s1 := (RTEllipse new size: #yourself; color: (Color blue alpha: 0.4)).
s2 := (RTLabel new text: 'Hello World'; height: 10).
c2 := RTVerticalCompositeShape new
shape1: s1;
shape2: s2.
c := RTHorizontalCompositeShape new
shape1: s1;
shape2: c2.
es := c elementsOn: #(30 60 80).
es @ RTDraggable.
v addAll: es.
RTHorizontalLineLayout on: v elements.
v
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Are we happy with RTVerticalCompositeShape, RTHorizontalCompositeShape
and RTCompositeShape ?
If yes, then RTLabelling (and its problem of passing the view along :-)
will be obsolete.
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel
http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev