Point subclass gives you the subclasses.
Point superclass does not give you the subclass.
Stef
On Feb 1, 2008, at 2:08 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Ok, so what would superclassDefinitions mean? Would it
mean the
inheritance definitions that point to the classes that I inherit from,
or the inheritance definitions that have me as superclass? :)
I think that no matter what point of view is, we will be able to find
another one that can induce confusion. For me incoming and outgoing
works, but that is just because I remember with the convention.
That is why when we discussed about this (quite a long time ago) we
said that if for invocations and accesses it is quite clear what
incoming and outgoing means, then we can use the same for inheritance,
just so that when people do not know they can always think that it is
like in this other cases in which we have arrows.
Maybe we could name them inheritancesFromMySubclasses and
inheritancesToMySuperclasses.
Doru
On Feb 1, 2008, at 1:54 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Stef, it is exactly because of getting people confused that we said
that in case of confusion draw the UML diagram and then you know
what
goes in and what gets out.
I know
still superclassDefinitions and subclassDefinitions are easier for me
to understand
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"The coherence of a trip is given by the clearness of the goal."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev