Hi,
I was at ESUG last week and I discussed about this issue with some people, and in the end
Stef told me "drop a mail in the mailing list, I am interested to understand what all
the other people think about it". So, here I am.
I have my project in which I am modeling development sessions. Each session object has a
number of meta-data (e.g., start, end time, etc.) and a collection of events. Each event
object owns some meta-data and some references to classes that were "touched" by
a given event (i.e., now I am using the Ring definition of the classes, since I plan to
serialize and deserialize them and I cannot serialize the real class object, it would be
too heavy, isn't it?).
Now the question: I would like to create a Moose model of a development session to be able
to import the sessions in the Moose panel and play around with the excellent Moose
tool-suite. How should I proceed? Do you think it's better to annotate and add pragmas
to the existing classes or to create a minimal parallel hierarchy of my model (i.e.,
MooseSession for MySession) and have something like MySession>>#asMooseDef which
returns an object of kind MooseSession?
Thanks in advance,
Roberto