8 Apr
2011
8 Apr
'11
8:39 a.m.
Errors in the Hudson job seem all related to a failure in test setup : getBelongsTo gets
called on a NamedEntity and fails. It should be easy to fix? Unfortunately I don't
have access to the source code for verveine.core and java famix. Please Nico release it!
On 8 avr. 2011, at 00:47, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi,
I just redid the build on hudson, and there are still 17 tests.
I also tried with the latest version locally to parse:
svn co https://www.iam.unibe.ch/scg/svn_repos/Lectures/P2/Examples/Annotations/
But, I got an error:
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ClassCastException:
fr.inria.verveine.core.gen.famix.AnnotationTypeAttribute cannot be cast to
fr.inria.verveine.core.gen.famix.Method
at fr.inria.verveine.extractor.java.JavaDictionary.ensureFamixMethod(Unknown Source)
at fr.inria.verveine.extractor.java.VerveineVisitor.methodInvocation(Unknown Source)
at fr.inria.verveine.extractor.java.VerveineVisitor.visit(Unknown Source)
at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.MethodInvocation.accept0(MethodInvocation.java:237)
at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChildren(ASTNode.java:2551)
at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.MethodInvocation.accept0(MethodInvocation.java:245)
at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChild(ASTNode.java:2528)
at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ExpressionStatement.accept0(ExpressionStatement.java:144)
at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChildren(ASTNode.java:2551)
at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.Block.accept0(Block.java:136)
at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChild(ASTNode.java:2528)
at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.MethodDeclaration.accept0(MethodDeclaration.java:504)
at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChildren(ASTNode.java:2551)
at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.TypeDeclaration.accept0(TypeDeclaration.java:484)
at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.acceptChildren(ASTNode.java:2551)
at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.CompilationUnit.accept0(CompilationUnit.java:219)
at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.accept(ASTNode.java:2480)
at fr.inria.verveine.extractor.java.FamixRequestor.acceptAST(Unknown Source)
at
org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.CompilationUnitResolver.resolve(CompilationUnitResolver.java:1016)
at
org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.CompilationUnitResolver.resolve(CompilationUnitResolver.java:628)
at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTParser.createASTs(ASTParser.java:982)
at fr.inria.verveine.extractor.java.VerveineJParser.parse(Unknown Source)
at fr.inria.verveine.extractor.java.VerveineJParser.main(Unknown Source)
Cheers,
Doru
On 8 Apr 2011, at 00:35, Nicolas Anquetil wrote:
--
Simon Denier
Howdy Simon,
Hummm, VerveineJ should not be broken.
At least, it is not on my computer :-)
And it should output annotation declaration and uses.
At least the subset defined in the metamodel (an annotation argument value is always a
string).
What version did you test? I commited a running version yesterday evening (but it is
still not built on Hudson yet, any problem with that?).
The only two red tests, are things not implemented yet (e.g. enumeration access)
If it still does not work, can you send me an URL for your test case (I could search for
it but I am lazy)
nicolas
----- Mail original -----
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing should have the right to be different."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev De: "Tudor Girba"
<tudor.girba(a)gmail.com>
À: "Moose-related development" <moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch>
Envoyé: Vendredi 8 Avril 2011 00:22:12
Objet: [Moose-dev] Re: Status of Java annotation import with infusion/VerveineJ?
Actually, I think VerveineJ is broken now.
Cheers,
Doru
On 8 Apr 2011, at 00:19, Tudor Girba wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev Hi Simon,
On 8 Apr 2011, at 00:08, Simon Denier wrote:
> Hello
>
> What's the status of Java annotation import with
> infusion/VerveineJ? I have seen some mails in the past weeks but
> didn't take a close look.
> Now I would like to use such information to draw dependencies
> linked to Spring annotations (for dependency injection).
>
> I tried both infusion and verveinej on the sample petclinic app for
> Spring but both returned a minimalistic set of annotation types
> (Override, SuppressWarnings, XmlElement, and XmlRootElement)
inFusion is not yet released. The one you are using is version 7.*.
For this one you need to add the jars where the annotations are
defined (the jars should be in a folder somewhere below the root
folder you give as input).
However, VerveineJ should already provide this info. What version
are you using? Nicolas, did I understand this part wrong?
Cheers,
Doru
> Any idea what is going wrong?
>
> --
> Simon Denier
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Value is always contextual."
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Obvious things are difficult to teach."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev