3 Dec
2009
3 Dec
'09
11:37 p.m.
Hi,
Yes we got something a bit like that (more the metamodel) when we developed CDIF exhcngae
format.
YOu would send the mmodel and the model.
Now for the context why not.
I do not understand. What kind of details are we talking about that cannot be inferred
from the meta-model?
extraction of literals, comments, for example
Stef
yes
the design of ImportContext predates the one of FAME and indeed we should be able to have
any metamodel and their dependency
Now it may happen that we will found some hidden (manually expressed in the
importingcontext and importer) dependency
that are not expressed in the metamodel: famix comment, literal.
A related issue is to encode the importing context in the mse. So that we know what is
not in the mse.
See comment #2 in the issue