Comment #6 on issue 495 by andreho...@gmail.com: Parametrized Types - Generics http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=495
Yes, it is a cleaner solution. The FAMIXParameterizedClass was our first idea, but create only the properties was simpler. What do you mean with "FAMIXSpecificParameterizedType as an instance of FAMIXType"? Do you mean FAMIXSpecificParameterizedType as a subclass of FAMIXType?
BTW, I think that only FAMIXParameterizedType is a better name.