24 Sep
2009
24 Sep
'09
11:01 p.m.
On 24 sept. 09, at 21:42, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
No. Technically you import namespace and then you can reference types
inside. But I dont know if we should consider the import as a first-
class access itself.
Yes, we should update the logic of the importer then.
--
Simon
Hi all
In the smalltalk importer for Famix 3, 'Smalltalk' is considered as
a namespace. As a consequence, any method which accesses Smalltalk
is tagged as making a FamixReference to the namespace.
Smalltalk is a global that points to a namespace.
Problem is, Cook assumes that any outgoing
references made by a
method should be a FamixType.
Why that?
In java can you access a namespace?
and it is a Type? So, what is right?
- 'Smalltalk' in a method should be considered as an access to a
global variable?
may be this is the easiest solution - or Cook should be more careful and select only
references to
FamixType.
--
Simon
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev