http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=395 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Classes defined in Moose-Algos-Graph should have a prefix different than MO. It is particularly confusing since Mondrian uses this prefix. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Cheers, Alexandre
On 5 May 2010, at 09:11, Simon Denier wrote:
On 5 mai 2010, at 15:08, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Side note: would it be possible to give a prefix different than 'MO'? I find this a little confusing.
Yes, should be done.
Cheers, Alexandre
On 5 May 2010, at 06:22, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi,
I am looking into the Moose-Algos-Graph package. It's pretty cool, especially that you can create graphs easily.
The only problem I encountered so far is that I cannot create nested graphs.
I just see now that MOGraphStructure is a subclass of MOGraphAlgorithm and that MOGraphAlgorithm has nodes and edges. This means that these can handle only one level of nodes and edges.
This problem was solved in Mondrian by making each node or edge a graph. Using a similar approach, MOGraphAlgorithm could then just point to one root node that holds everything.
Or maybe we need a MOGraphBuilder that creates the graph and MOGraphAlgorithm just deals with a set of nodes and edges.
What do you think?
Cheers, Doru
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"It's not what we do that matters most, it's how we do it."
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
-- Simon
Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev