14 Sep
2015
14 Sep
'15
10:39 a.m.
Hi,
I confirm that fixing the branch names corrected the problem with package
loading.
The feedback from Thierry and Dale was fruitful.
Thank you guys for your help.
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Dale Henrichs <
dale.henrichs(a)gemtalksystems.com> wrote:
On 09/11/2015 08:20 AM, Usman Bhatti wrote:
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Dale Henrichs <
dale.henrichs(a)gemtalksystems.com> wrote:
On 9/11/15 6:09 AM, Usman Bhatti wrote:
Hi,
It seems that Metacello does not consider PackageName-xyz and
PacakgeName-BranchName-xyz as the same package. I suspect it because when I
look at the packages loaded by two different configurations with and
without branch names as package name suffixes are not the same. Could
someone knowing the internals of Metacello confirm it?
So, here is a log of Metacello of the loadDirective for ConfigOfGlamour
with and without packages with branch names. I have truncated the output to
highlight important parts of the log.
----------- Metacello log follows ----------------------
Without branching (Rubric and Glamour-Morphic-Renderer loaded only once):
linear load :
atomic load : 3.3.0 [ConfigurationOfGlamour]
linear load : 3.1.3.Moose51 [ConfigurationOfGlamourCore]
--------------------List of Packages----------------
atomic load : 1.2.14.Moose51 [ConfigurationOfRubric]
load : Rubric-AndreiChis.207
load : Glamour-Morphic-Renderer-AndreiChis.324
--------------------List of Packages----------------
linear load : 1.13 [ConfigurationOfRoassal2]
linear load : 3.1.4 [ConfigurationOfGlamourCore]
--------------------List of Packages----------------
With branching (old versions overwrites the fixes):
linear load :
atomic load : 3.3.0 [ConfigurationOfGlamour]
linear load : 3.1.3.Moose51 [ConfigurationOfGlamourCore]
--------------------List of Packages----------------
atomic load : 1.2.14.Moose51 [ConfigurationOfRubric]
load : Rubric-Moose51-usmanbhatti.207
load :
Glamour-Morphic-Renderer-Moose51-usmanbhatti.324
--------------------List of Packages----------------
linear load : 1.13 [ConfigurationOfRoassal2]
linear load : 3.1.4 [ConfigurationOfGlamourCore]
atomic load : 1.2.15 [ConfigurationOfRubric]
load : Rubric-AlainPlantec.206
load : Glamour-Morphic-Renderer-AndreiChis.321
--------------------List of Packages----------------
---------------
What it actually changes is packages with branch name are overwritten
with their predecessors and hence fixes are not correctly included in the
resulting image. It seems that ensuring correct loading in the presence of
branched packages requires no other configuration is loading previous
versions of the branched packages.
While Thierry's comments (and my own) apply, I'd like to dive a little
deeper into this for a minute ... I would like to compare the Metacello
specs for Glamour-Morphic-Renderer in ConfigurationOfGlamourCore (that
resolves to Glamour-Morphic-Renderer-Moose51-usmanbhatti.324) and the spec
for Glamour-Morphic-Renderer in ConfigurationOfRubric (that resolves to
Glamour-Morphic-Renderer-AndreiChis.321)...
I see that in Glamour-Morphic-Renderer-Moose51-usmanbhatti.324 the
version number (324 ... which btw is another convention:) is greater than
321, so I do believe that if you had been using the branch naming
conventions Glamour-Morphic-Renderer-AndreiChis.321 would not have been
loaded .... and I suppose we'll find out shortly:)
Yes, I really hope (and I'll test it shortly) that it is just a matter of
naming convention that results in undesired packages getting loaded.
Yep, you and me both:) Let me know how it goes...
Dale
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev