Is there anything (at all) to gain in my continuing to use ROMondrianViewBuilder versus "native" Roassal? Is ROMondrianViewBuilder "just" for backward compatability to ease the transition and draw people into the new system? Or... is there stuff that ROMondrianViewBuilder does better than "native" Roassal - in terms of conciseness, ease of use, flexibility, access to layouts, features, etc...
I am trying to determine whether putting effort into the perhaps easier step of going from Mondrian to ROMondrianViewBuilder may be wasted leaving me missing out on any new power of Roassal, or require more effort later to rework for native Roassal.
You may have gone over this before, but how do the purpose and architecture of the two differ?
cheers -ben