12 Jun
2008
12 Jun
'08
9:37 p.m.
Indeed, Slots are implemented in Fame, and the CodeGenerator uses that
instead of direct references or collections. That is why FAMIX uses
Slots.
Doru
On Jun 12, 2008, at 9:29 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
ok
--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.tudorgirba.com/blog
"Every thing has its own flow."
We still did not generate the add*: selectors for
adding elements in
collections, but Toon said he will do this shortly, so we will
regenerate afterwards. Until then, instead of adding in the
collection, you can just set the opposite link and this will populate
the element in the collection due to the Slot implementation.
Is Slot part of FAME?
what is the dependency with moose?
For example, see:
FAMIXTest>>testSlot
| c m |
c := FAMIXClass new.
m := FAMIXMethod new.
m parentClass: c.
self assert: (c methods first = m)
Cheers,
Doru
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev