13 Mar
2014
13 Mar
'14
1:55 p.m.
remember that Moose is a "data Analysis platform" it is not only for
software, so yes somebody not working with software can use it.
I have no particular objection to change the name except that changing
name means you restart from scratch and have to re-explain to people
what it is ...
nicolas
On 13/03/2014 13:46, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Hi!
The Moose image offers much more than offering moose. For example, I have a postdoc
working on Astronomy images and she is using the moose image not because of moose, but
because of what is shipped with it.
Does something who is not interested in analyzing software may find the moose image
useful? The answer is absolutely yes.
What about changing the name of the Moose image into something closer to what it really
offer?
Maybe Pharo4Modelling ? PharoModellingEdition?
I think this discussion is important.
Cheers,
Alexandre