Hi Volkert,
Sorry for replying late. This is a rather busy time for me.
As you have noticed, Roassal2 is not fully compatible with Roassal1. However, we are here to help!
view := ROMondrianViewBuilder titled: 'asdasd’.
This now works (you need to update Roassal2):
view := RTMondrianViewBuilder titled: 'asdasd’.
view shape rectangle withText: #shortName; textVerticalPadding: -10; fontSize: 6.
Unfortunately, this is not supported yet.
What you can do is
view shape rectangle width: 50; text: #shortName; fontSize: 6.
No text padding for now. Is it okay however? The idea is to go incrementally.
view addMenu: 'Zoom in' callBack: [ :stack | … ].
you can do:
view view addMenu: ‘Zoom in’ callback: [ “do your stuff” ]
Please, report things that are missing. This is very important :-)
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel
http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
> On Nov 19, 2014, at 12:55 PM, volkert@nivoba.de wrote:
>
> Alexandre, any hints/advice for me?
>
> BW,
> Volkert
>
> Am 17.11.2014 um 23:06 schrieb Alexandre Bergel:
>> Tomorrow I will provide a detailed answer.
>>
>> Alexandre
>> --
>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
>> Alexandre Bergel
http://www.bergel.eu http://www.bergel.eu/
>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Nov 17, 2014, at 1:14 PM, volkert@nivoba.de
mailto:volkert@nivoba.de wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear All,
>>>
>>> i am using heavily Mondrian (ROMondrianViewBuilder) from Roassal1 in my Tool/Project. Today i tried
>>> to migrate my work to Roassal2 and found out, that the Interface of RTMondrianViewBuilder has
>>> changed a lot.
>>>
>>> Is there a list what has changed/what was removed/what are the alternatives/...?
>>>
>>> Some examples
>>>
>>> view := ROMondrianViewBuilder titled: 'asdasd'.
>>>
>>> view shape rectangle withText: #shortName; textVerticalPadding: -10; fontSize: 6.
>>>
>>> view addMenu: 'Zoom in' callBack: [ :stack | … ].
>>>
>>> Anther question:
>>>
>>> How can i change the line thickness of a Mondrian Node? I find the default size is to thick.
>>>
>>> BW,
>>>
>>> Volkert
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>> Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
mailto:Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
>>>
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
mailto:Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
>>
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> --
> www.nivoba.de
http://www.nivoba.de/
>
> "The more complex an object, the larger the investment in learning to use it, and the greater the resistance to abandon it.", NW
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev@iam.unibe.ch
>
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev